[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <FE145E46-D160-4826-9D81-553EB2A660C1@amacapital.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:28:11 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/entry: Force rcu_irq_enter() when in idle task
> On Jun 12, 2020, at 12:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> writes:
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:49:53AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> I will therefore address this issue in a follow-on patch.
>>
>> I should add that -your- patch from yesterday did -not- cause this
>> problem, in case that is of interest.
>
> So I still can add it back and amend the changelog and comment:
>
> Change the condition from !rcu_is_watching() to is_idle_task(current) ||
> rcu_is_watching() which enforces that interrupts in the idle task
> unconditionally invoke rcu_irq_enter() independent of the RCU state. For
> most scenarios is_idle_task() would be sufficient but Task RCU needs it
> according to Paul.
>
>
Can you easily get a call trace for a case where the system is fully booted, is_idle_task returns false, and rcu_is_watching() also returns false?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists