linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] proc fixes v2 for v5.8-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871rmkozf5.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:29:50 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] proc fixes v2 for v5.8-rc1

ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

Please pull the proc-linus branch from the git tree:

    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git proc-linus

    HEAD: ef1548adada51a2f32ed7faef50aa465e1b4c5da proc: Use new_inode not new_inode_pseudo

Much to my surprise syzbot found a very old bug in proc that the recent
changes made easier to reproce.  This bug is subtle enough it looks like
it fooled everyone who should know better.

Eric

---

>From ef1548adada51a2f32ed7faef50aa465e1b4c5da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:42:03 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] proc: Use new_inode not new_inode_pseudo

Recently syzbot reported that unmounting proc when there is an ongoing
inotify watch on the root directory of proc could result in a use
after free when the watch is removed after the unmount of proc
when the watcher exits.

Commit 69879c01a0c3 ("proc: Remove the now unnecessary internal mount
of proc") made it easier to unmount proc and allowed syzbot to see the
problem, but looking at the code it has been around for a long time.

Looking at the code the fsnotify watch should have been removed by
fsnotify_sb_delete in generic_shutdown_super.  Unfortunately the inode
was allocated with new_inode_pseudo instead of new_inode so the inode
was not on the sb->s_inodes list.  Which prevented
fsnotify_unmount_inodes from finding the inode and removing the watch
as well as made it so the "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount" warning
could not find the inodes to warn about them.

Make all of the inodes in proc visible to generic_shutdown_super,
and fsnotify_sb_delete by using new_inode instead of new_inode_pseudo.
The only functional difference is that new_inode places the inodes
on the sb->s_inodes list.

I wrote a small test program and I can verify that without changes it
can trigger this issue, and by replacing new_inode_pseudo with
new_inode the issues goes away.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/000000000000d788c905a7dfa3f4@google.com
Reported-by: syzbot+7d2debdcdb3cb93c1e5e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 0097875bd415 ("proc: Implement /proc/thread-self to point at the directory of the current thread")
Fixes: 021ada7dff22 ("procfs: switch /proc/self away from proc_dir_entry")
Fixes: 51f0885e5415 ("vfs,proc: guarantee unique inodes in /proc")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 fs/proc/inode.c       | 2 +-
 fs/proc/self.c        | 2 +-
 fs/proc/thread_self.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index f40c2532c057..28d6105e908e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ const struct inode_operations proc_link_inode_operations = {

 struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, struct proc_dir_entry *de)
 {
-	struct inode *inode = new_inode_pseudo(sb);
+	struct inode *inode = new_inode(sb);

 	if (inode) {
 		inode->i_ino = de->low_ino;
diff --git a/fs/proc/self.c b/fs/proc/self.c
index ca5158fa561c..72cd69bcaf4a 100644
--- a/fs/proc/self.c
+++ b/fs/proc/self.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ int proc_setup_self(struct super_block *s)
 	inode_lock(root_inode);
 	self = d_alloc_name(s->s_root, "self");
 	if (self) {
-		struct inode *inode = new_inode_pseudo(s);
+		struct inode *inode = new_inode(s);
 		if (inode) {
 			inode->i_ino = self_inum;
 			inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
diff --git a/fs/proc/thread_self.c b/fs/proc/thread_self.c
index ac284f409568..a553273fbd41 100644
--- a/fs/proc/thread_self.c
+++ b/fs/proc/thread_self.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ int proc_setup_thread_self(struct super_block *s)
 	inode_lock(root_inode);
 	thread_self = d_alloc_name(s->s_root, "thread-self");
 	if (thread_self) {
-		struct inode *inode = new_inode_pseudo(s);
+		struct inode *inode = new_inode(s);
 		if (inode) {
 			inode->i_ino = thread_self_inum;
 			inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
-- 
2.20.1