linux-kernel - Re: 5.7-rc0: kswapd eats cpu during a disk test?!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200612230552.GA3593@amd>
Date:   Sat, 13 Jun 2020 01:05:52 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mhocko@...e.cz,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: 5.7-rc0: kswapd eats cpu during a disk test?!

Hi!

> > +CC linux-mm
> > 
> > On 5/31/20 12:34 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > This is simple cat /dev/sda > /dev/zero... on thinkpad x60 (x86-32),
> > > with spinning rust.
> > > 
> > >   PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU %MEM     TIME+  COMMAND
> > >    1000 root      20   0       0      0      0 R  53.3  0.0  57:34.93  kswapd0
> > >   27897 root      20   0    6976    580    536 R  44.5  0.0   1:44.53  cat
> > > 
> > > It keeps both CPUs busy... and I don't think that's right.
> > 
> > Does an older kernel behave differently here?
> 
> Let me try on x220 (x86-64, first):
> 
>   737 root      20   0    5404    744    680 R  31.2   0.0   0:09.98 cat        
>  1024 root      20   0       0      0      0 S  21.4   0.0 165:22.68 kswapd0    
> 
> That was with ssd, result with spinning rust is similar:
> 
>   859 root      20   0    5404    740    672 D  21.1   0.0   0:03.33 cat        
>  1024 root      20   0       0      0      0 R  11.8   0.0 165:33.07 kswapd0    
> 
> 5.7-rc1+ kernel.
> 
> Performance of spinning rust is down, too, on x60:
> 
> pavel@amd:~/misc/hw/hdd1t$ sudo ddrescue --force /dev/sda1 /dev/null
> GNU ddrescue 1.19
> Press Ctrl-C to interrupt
> rescued:     2147 MB,  errsize:       0 B,  current rate:    3080 kB/s
>    ipos:     2147 MB,   errors:       0,    average rate:    5382 kB/s
>       opos:     2147 MB, run time:    6.65 m,  successful read:
>       0 s ago
>       Finished
> pavel@amd:~/misc/hw/hdd1t$ uname -a
> Linux amd 5.7.0-next-20200611+ #123 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 11
>  15:41:22 CEST 2020 i686 GNU/Linux
> 
> And there's something clearly wrong here:
> 
>   966 root      20   0       0      0      0 R  94.4  0.0   8:18.82   kswapd0
>   23933 root      20   0    4612   1112   1028 D  80.6  0.0   0:26.40   ddrescue
>   

Same x60 under older kernel:

pavel@amd:/data/fast/pavel$ sudo ddrescue --force /dev/sda4 /dev/null
GNU ddrescue 1.19
Press Ctrl-C to interrupt
rescued:     6593 MB,  errsize:       0 B,  current rate:   60424 kB/s
   ipos:     6593 MB,   errors:       0,    average rate:   95563 kB/s

 3539 root      20   0    4616   1136   1048 D  21.4  0.0   0:15.63 ddrescue
   865 root      20   0       0      0      0 S   6.9  0.0   0:04.91  kswapd0

Linux amd 4.6.0+ #172 SMP Sun Aug 14 11:25:34 CEST 2016 i686 GNU/Linux

These are more reasonable numbers.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)