[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <030bb11d193d13a2d1c161a133bb7b88093a1fe9.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:14:02 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>, jbaron@...mai.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/24] dyndbg: add maybe(str,"") macro to reduce code
On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 09:57 -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> reduce word count via macro, no actual object change.
>
> OTOH, maybe() could be scrubbed if printk's default printing (iirc) of
> "(null)" pointers is deemed appropriate for the log-msg.
[]
> diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
[]
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ do { \
> #define vpr_info(fmt, ...) vnpr_info(1, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> #define v2pr_info(fmt, ...) vnpr_info(2, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> +#define maybe(str, empty) ( str ? str : empty )
This macro is unnecessary.
An even shorter very commonly used gcc extension would be
str ?: empty
Powered by blists - more mailing lists