lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:29:35 +0200 From: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it> To: Dinesh G Dutt <didutt@...il.com> Cc: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Donald Sharp <sharpd@...ulusnetworks.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>, Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...t.it>, Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFC,net-next, 0/5] Strict mode for VRF On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:05:49 -0700 Dinesh G Dutt <didutt@...il.com> wrote: > Thanks for doing this Andrea. This is a very important patch. I'll let > the others comment on the specificity of the patch, but strict mode=1 > should be the default . > > Dinesh Hi Dinesh, thanks for your comments! I chose to disable the strict mode(=0) by default to be conservative. Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists