[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d99dfe5-67ed-00d2-c2da-77058fb770c6@web.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:15:12 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rvt: Improve exception handling in rvt_create_qp()
> … The patch fixes this issue by
> calling rvt_free_rq().
I suggest to choose another imperative wording for your change description.
Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for the commit message?
…
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c
> @@ -1203,6 +1203,7 @@ struct ib_qp *rvt_create_qp(struct ib_pd *ibpd,
> qp->s_flags = RVT_S_SIGNAL_REQ_WR;
> err = alloc_ud_wq_attr(qp, rdi->dparms.node);
> if (err) {
> + rvt_free_rq(&qp->r_rq);
> ret = (ERR_PTR(err));
> goto bail_driver_priv;
> }
How do you think about the following code variant with the addition
of a jump target?
err = alloc_ud_wq_attr(qp, rdi->dparms.node);
if (err) {
ret = (ERR_PTR(err));
- goto bail_driver_priv;
+ goto bail_free_rq;
}
…
bail_rq_wq:
- rvt_free_rq(&qp->r_rq);
free_ud_wq_attr(qp);
+
+bail_free_rq:
+ rvt_free_rq(&qp->r_rq);
bail_driver_priv:
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists