[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcuRvaQwcTP0+Y+QJTvjoEzYTvV40coUxnsZPfWnwcNMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:27:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>,
Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, wu000273@....edu,
Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: bma150: fix ref count leak in bma150_open
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 8:58 AM Navid Emamdoost
<navid.emamdoost@...il.com> wrote:
>
> in bma150_open, pm_runtime_get_sync is called which
> increments the counter even in case of failure, leading to incorrect
> ref count. In case of failure, decrement the ref count before returning.
...
> error = pm_runtime_get_sync(&bma150->client->dev);
> if (error < 0 && error != -ENOSYS)
> - return error;
> + goto out;
So, what will happen in case of -ENOSYS?
...
> + pm_runtime_put(&bma150->client->dev);
Slightly better to use _put_noidle(). (More consistency with error path)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists