[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b0147ab-f0bc-7380-6300-90e555534cb4@web.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:33:34 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>,
Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: stmfts: fix ref count leak in stmfts_input_open
> in stmfts_input_open, …
* Can the term “reference count” become relevant also for this commit message
besides other possible adjustments?
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes”?
…
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/stmfts.c
…
> @@ -367,6 +367,9 @@ static int stmfts_input_open(struct input_dev *dev)
> }
>
> return 0;
> +out:
> + pm_runtime_put(&sdata->client->dev);
> + return err;
> }
…
Perhaps use the label “put_runtime” instead?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists