lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:34:17 +0100
From:   Chris Boot <>
To:     Finn Thain <>,
        Chris Boot <>
Cc:,,,,, Bart Van Assche <>,
        Chuhong Yuan <>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <>,
        Nicholas Bellinger <>,
        Stefan Richter <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target/sbp: remove firewire SBP target driver

On 14/06/2020 01:03, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020, Chris Boot wrote:
>> I no longer have the time to maintain this subsystem nor the hardware to
>> test patches with. 
> Then why not patch MAINTAINERS, and orphan it, as per usual practice?
> $ git log --oneline MAINTAINERS | grep -i orphan

My patch to remove it was in response to:

>> It also doesn't appear to have any active users so I doubt anyone will 
>> miss it.
> It's not unusual that any Linux driver written more than 5 years ago 
> "doesn't appear to have any active users".
> If a driver has been orphaned and broken in the past, and no-one stepped 
> up to fix it within a reasonable period, removal would make sense. But 
> that's not the case here.
> I haven't used this driver for a long time, but I still own PowerMacs with 
> firewire, and I know I'm not the only one.

I expect that if someone finds this useful it can stick around (but
that's not my call). I just don't have the time or inclination or
hardware to be able to maintain it anymore, so someone else would have
to pick it up.


Chris Boot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists