lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 14 Jun 2020 17:30:18 +0200
From:   Greg KH <>
To:     Markus Elfring <>
Cc:     Navid Emamdoost <>,, Navid Emamdoost <>,
        Kangjie Lu <>,
        Stephen McCamant <>,
        Qiushi Wu <>,
        "David S. Miller" <>,
        Fugang Duan <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: fix ref count leaking when pm_runtime_get_sync

On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:25:38AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > in fec_enet_mdio_read, …
> I am curious under which circumstances you would like to improve
> such commit messages.
> * Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful?
> * Which source code analysis tools did trigger to send
>   update suggestions according to 16 similar issues for today?


This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.


greg k-h's patch email bot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists