[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200614071456.GE2629255@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 09:14:56 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethernet: Fix memory leak in ethoc_probe()
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:26:12AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > … The patch fixes this issue.
>
> I propose to replace this information by the tag “Fixes”.
> Please choose another imperative wording for your change description.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists