lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:16:55 +0200 From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com> Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add missing asm/cacheflush.h Le 14/06/2020 à 20:57, Chuck Lever a écrit : > Hi Christophe - > >> On Jun 14, 2020, at 1:07 PM, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote: >> >> Even if that's only a warning, not including asm/cacheflush.h >> leads to svc_flush_bvec() being empty allthough powerpc defines >> ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE. >> >> CC net/sunrpc/svcsock.o >> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:227:5: warning: "ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE" is not defined [-Wundef] >> #if ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE >> ^ >> >> Fixes: ca07eda33e01 ("SUNRPC: Refactor svc_recvfrom()") >> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> >> --- >> I detected this on linux-next on June 4th and warned Chuck. Seems like it went into mainline anyway. > > Thanks for your patch. I've searched my mailbox. It appears I never > received your June 4th e-mail. It is there: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/868915eb-8fed-0600-ea5d-31ae874457b1@csgroup.eu/ > > Does your patch also address: > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=159194369128024&w=2 ? I guess it does, yes. > > If so, then > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> > > should be added to the patch description. > > Ideally, compilation on x86_64 should have thrown the same warning, > but it didn't. Why would the x86_64 build behave differently than > ppc64 or i386? I think it depends whether you have selected CONFIG_BLOCK or not. In my embedded config, CONFIG_BLOCK isn't selected. When CONFIG_BLOCK is selected, there is the following inclusion chain: CC net/sunrpc/svcsock.o In file included from ./include/linux/highmem.h:12:0, from ./include/linux/pagemap.h:11, from ./include/linux/blkdev.h:16, from ./include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23, from ./include/linux/writeback.h:14, from ./include/linux/memcontrol.h:22, from ./include/net/sock.h:53, from ./include/net/inet_sock.h:22, from ./include/linux/udp.h:16, from net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:31: ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:26:2: warning: #warning Coucous [-Wcpp] #warning test But linux/blkdev.h includes linux/pagemap.h only when CONFIG_BLOCK is defined. > > >> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c >> index 5c4ec9386f81..d9e99cb09aab 100644 >> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c >> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c >> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ >> #include <net/tcp_states.h> >> #include <linux/uaccess.h> >> #include <asm/ioctls.h> >> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h> > > Nit: Let's include <linux/highmem.h> in net/sunrpc/svcsock.h instead > of <asm/cacheflush.h> directly. Ok, I'll post v2. > > >> #include <linux/sunrpc/types.h> >> #include <linux/sunrpc/clnt.h> >> -- >> 2.25.0 >> > > -- > Chuck Lever > > > Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists