linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: Use node_nr_slabs() instead of slabs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtWFNnSLa6KQwG3CK9xjWkqE9OKfVZpaZurQArRSzG+FTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:20:45 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: Use node_nr_slabs() instead
 of slabs_node()

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:15 PM Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com> wrote:
>
> 2020년 6월 14일 (일) 오후 9:39, Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>님이 작성:
> >
> > In the some code, we already get the kmem_cache_node, so we can
> > use node_nr_slabs() directly instead of slabs_node(). Check the
> > condition of n->nr_partial can also be removed because we can get
> > the correct result via node_nr_slabs().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> If appying this patch, there is no reference to slabs_node(). Please remove it.
>
> Thanks.

OK, Thanks. I will remove it in the next version.

-- 
Yours,
Muchun