[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvgo526Kn5qSpmV_azf70UCYNaFbyo7LgXGQykzyQV7v=6ahg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 20:47:27 +0100
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha: Fix build around srm_sysrq_reboot_op
Hi all,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 10:11, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
>
> The patch introducing the struct was probably never compile tested,
> because it sets a handler with a wrong function signature. Wrap the
> handler into a functions with the correct signature to fix the build.
>
> Fixes: 0f1c9688a194 ("tty/sysrq: alpha: export and use __sysrq_get_key_op()")
> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Just coming back from 10 offline days and retracing my testing ...
Seems that I've copied the wrong .config.
So a follow-up `make arch/alpha/kernel/setup.o' did not build
anything... yet the command was _successful_.
This is something that should be fixed IMHO - doing the same for
drivers/ (for example drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.o)
results in an obvious audible error.
That said, apologies for the issue. I'll be more thorough and
carefully audit the build logs for future patches.
-Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists