linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] [v3] i2c: imx-lpi2c: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM6PR04MB4966A1FD80A29BA1E63247C0809C0@AM6PR04MB4966.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:33:40 +0000
From:   Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
CC:     "kjlu@....edu" <kjlu@....edu>,
        Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [v3] i2c: imx-lpi2c: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error

> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 5:12 PM
> 
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:16:40PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even the
> > call returns an error code. Thus a corresponding decrement is needed
> > on the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
> 
> Can you point me to a discussion where it was decided that this is a proper fix?
> I'd think we rather should fix pm_runtime_get_sync() but maybe there are
> technical reasons against it.

I had the same feeling.
Copy pm guys to comments.

Regards
Aisheng