linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v27 00/15] Multicolor Framework v27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:31:13 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:     <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v27 00/15] Multicolor Framework v27

Pavel

On 6/15/20 3:27 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> This is the multi color LED framework.   This framework presents clustered
>> colored LEDs into an array and allows the user space to adjust the brightness
>> of the cluster using a single file write.  The individual colored LEDs
>> intensities are controlled via a single file that is an array of
>> LEDs
> Please don't do this. Pinging whoever you think is blocking the merge
> is okay, but resending big series just because people are busy over
> the merge window is not cool.

Actually that is not the case.  I missed adding Rob H to the series so I 
resent the patches to add Rob in.

There was no intent to resend because I thought it was blocked.

I know we are in a merge window and thoroughly understand that ppl are busy.

If I thought it was blocked I would have just bumped the first patch.

Dan


> Thanks,
>
> 								Pavel