linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Refactor two assignments in css_task_iter_next_css

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:11:27 +0800
From:   Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:     <zzuedu2000@....com>, <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:     <tj@...nel.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
        <songmuchun@...edance.com>, <buddy.zhang@...yun.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Refactor two assignments in
 css_task_iter_next_css_set()

On 2020/6/15 7:22, zzuedu2000@....com wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 18:10 +0800, James.Bottomley@...xxxx wrote:
> 
>> it's arguable that having two statements instead of one makes the code
>> marginally more readable.
> 
> Above the function there is a similar line of code:
> l = it->tcset_pos->next;
> One line of code makes the code style consistent and more readable
> 

It would be much better if you are fixing a bug or developing a new feature
and while at it you do this cleanup conveniently, but this patch alone has
little value.