lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:37:23 +0000
From:   Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] i2c: imx: Fix external abort on early interrupt

> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 9:00 PM
> 
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:18:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 6/12/20 1:51 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >
> > >> This basically kills the concept of devm for interrupts. Some other
> > >
> > > It only works when you can ensure you have all interrupts disabled
> > > (and none pending) in remove() or the error paths of probe() etc.
> >
> > But when requesting the interrupt as shared the interrupt handler can
> > get called any time, even if you have disabled the IRQ source in your
> > IP core....The shared IRQ debug code tests this.
> 
> Yes, so you'd need something like
> 
> 	if (clks_are_off)
> 		return IRQ_NONE;
> 

I understand this. But ..

> or skip devm_ for interrupts and handle it manually. (IIRC the input subsystem
> really frowns upon devm + irqs for such reasons)
> 
> D'accord?

Handle it manually looks to me can only address the issue for probe error path.
But how can it handle the normal running cases that shared irq arrived when device
is in runtime suspend state?

Regards
Aisheng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ