[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3b09954-9973-8cda-747f-0c43b2de5700@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:02:55 +0800
From: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<paulmck@...nel.org>, "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<shakeelb@...gle.com>, James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
<alex.huangjianhui@...wei.com>, <dylix.dailei@...wei.com>,
<chenzefeng2@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] creds: convert cred.usage to refcount_t
On 2020/6/13 2:34, Kees Cook wrote:
> From: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
>
> atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference
> counters with the following properties:
> - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set()
> - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero
> - once counter reaches zero, its further
> increments aren't allowed
> - counter schema uses basic atomic operations
> (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.)
>
> Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided
> refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows
> and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows
> can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable.
>
> The variable cred.usage is used as pure reference counter.
> Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations.
>
> **Important note for maintainers:
>
> Some functions from refcount_t API defined in lib/refcount.c
> have different memory ordering guarantees than their atomic
> counterparts.Please check Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> for more information.
>
> Normally the differences should not matter since refcount_t provides
> enough guarantees to satisfy the refcounting use cases, but in
> some rare cases it might matter.
> Please double check that you don't have some undocumented
> memory guarantees for this variable usage.
>
> For the cred.usage it might make a difference
> in following places:
> - get_task_cred(): increment in refcount_inc_not_zero() only
> guarantees control dependency on success vs. fully ordered
> atomic counterpart
> - put_cred(): decrement in refcount_dec_and_test() only
> provides RELEASE ordering and ACQUIRE ordering on success
> vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart
>
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190306110549.7628-4-elena.reshetova@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Currently this patch is better than my RFC patch
Looks good to me.
Thanks
Xiaoming Ni
Powered by blists - more mailing lists