[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1592208439-17594-3-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:07:19 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] genirq: Do not test disabled IRQs with DEBUG_SHIRQ
Testing events during freeing of disabled shared interrupts
(CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ) leads to false positives. The driver disabled
interrupts on purpose to be sure that they will not fire during device
removal.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
---
Changes since v1:
1. New patch.
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 761911168438..f19f0dedc30d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1775,12 +1775,14 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, void *dev_id)
/*
* It's a shared IRQ -- the driver ought to be prepared for an IRQ
* event to happen even now it's being freed, so let's make sure that
- * is so by doing an extra call to the handler ....
+ * is so by doing an extra call to the handler.
+ * Although the driver could disable the interrupts just before freeing
+ * just to avoid such trouble - don't test it then.
*
* ( We do this after actually deregistering it, to make sure that a
* 'real' IRQ doesn't run in parallel with our fake. )
*/
- if (action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) {
+ if (action->flags & IRQF_SHARED && !desc->depth) {
local_irq_save(flags);
action->handler(irq, dev_id);
local_irq_restore(flags);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists