linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 19/27] clk: bcm: rpi: Add DT provider for the clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4d8dbe4aaae98b3d3812ad7c3dba53d645cadbaf.1592210452.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:40:59 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
        Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Subject: [PATCH v5 19/27] clk: bcm: rpi: Add DT provider for the clocks

For the upcoming registration of the clocks provided by the firmware, make
sure it's exposed to the device tree providers.

Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
index d2cb90c086a7..5f4e2d49432f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
 
 #define A2W_PLL_FRAC_BITS		20
 
+#define NUM_FW_CLKS			16
+
 struct raspberrypi_clk {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct rpi_firmware *firmware;
@@ -282,11 +284,13 @@ static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 
 static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
 	struct device_node *firmware_node;
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct rpi_firmware *firmware;
 	struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi;
 	struct clk_hw *hw;
+	int ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * We can be probed either through the an old-fashioned
@@ -316,6 +320,11 @@ static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	rpi->firmware = firmware;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpi);
 
+	clk_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(clk_data, hws, NUM_FW_CLKS),
+				GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!clk_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	hw = raspberrypi_register_pllb(rpi);
 	if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize pllb, %ld\n", PTR_ERR(hw));
@@ -325,6 +334,13 @@ static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	hw = raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(rpi);
 	if (IS_ERR(hw))
 		return PTR_ERR(hw);
+	clk_data->hws[RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID] = hw;
+	clk_data->num = RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID + 1;
+
+	ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
+					  clk_data);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	rpi->cpufreq = platform_device_register_data(dev, "raspberrypi-cpufreq",
 						     -1, NULL, 0);
-- 
git-series 0.9.1