[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <507a2266-39cd-0887-1b6b-59764fddd153@web.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:45:40 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>,
Chen Wandun <chenwandun@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf tools: Fix potential memory leaks in perf
events parser
> Fix memory leak of in function parse_events_term__sym_hw()
> and parse_events_term__clone() when string duplication failed.
Can a wording like “Fix memory leaks in …” be more appropriate for
the final commit message?
Would you find any other description variant more pleasing?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists