[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eeqgh4x7.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:17:16 +0530
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@...six.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/6] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall
This accidently got reposted. Please ignore.
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
> Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags
> that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM
> specification.
>
> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v11..v12:
> * None
>
> v10..v11:
> * None
>
> v9..v10:
> * Added ack from Ira.
>
> Resend:
> * None
>
> v8..v9:
> * s/SCM/PMEM device. [ Dan Williams, Aneesh ]
>
> v7..v8:
> * Added a clarification on bit-ordering of Health Bitmap
>
> Resend:
> * None
>
> v6..v7:
> * None
>
> v5..v6:
> * New patch in the series
> ---
> Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst b/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst
> index 3493631a60f8..48fcf1255a33 100644
> --- a/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst
> @@ -220,13 +220,51 @@ from the LPAR memory.
> **H_SCM_HEALTH**
>
> | Input: drcIndex
> -| Out: *health-bitmap, health-bit-valid-bitmap*
> +| Out: *health-bitmap (r4), health-bit-valid-bitmap (r5)*
> | Return Value: *H_Success, H_Parameter, H_Hardware*
>
> Given a DRC Index return the info on predictive failure and overall health of
> -the NVDIMM. The asserted bits in the health-bitmap indicate a single predictive
> -failure and health-bit-valid-bitmap indicate which bits in health-bitmap are
> -valid.
> +the PMEM device. The asserted bits in the health-bitmap indicate one or more states
> +(described in table below) of the PMEM device and health-bit-valid-bitmap indicate
> +which bits in health-bitmap are valid. The bits are reported in
> +reverse bit ordering for example a value of 0xC400000000000000
> +indicates bits 0, 1, and 5 are valid.
> +
> +Health Bitmap Flags:
> +
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| Bit | Definition |
> ++======+=======================================================================+
> +| 00 | PMEM device is unable to persist memory contents. |
> +| | If the system is powered down, nothing will be saved. |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 01 | PMEM device failed to persist memory contents. Either contents were |
> +| | not saved successfully on power down or were not restored properly on |
> +| | power up. |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 02 | PMEM device contents are persisted from previous IPL. The data from |
> +| | the last boot were successfully restored. |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 03 | PMEM device contents are not persisted from previous IPL. There was no|
> +| | data to restore from the last boot. |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 04 | PMEM device memory life remaining is critically low |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 05 | PMEM device will be garded off next IPL due to failure |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 06 | PMEM device contents cannot persist due to current platform health |
> +| | status. A hardware failure may prevent data from being saved or |
> +| | restored. |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 07 | PMEM device is unable to persist memory contents in certain conditions|
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 08 | PMEM device is encrypted |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +| 09 | PMEM device has successfully completed a requested erase or secure |
> +| | erase procedure. |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> +|10:63 | Reserved / Unused |
> ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> **H_SCM_PERFORMANCE_STATS**
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
--
Cheers
~ Vaibhav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists