[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2006151517230.9003@namei.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:21:32 +1000 (AEST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Micah Morton <mortonm@...omium.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID LSM changes for v5.8
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Micah Morton wrote:
> This patch was sent to the security mailing list and there were no objections.
Standard practice for new or modified LSM hooks is that they are reviewed
and acked by maintainers of major LSMs (SELinux, AppArmor, and Smack, at
least).
"No objections" should be considered "not reviewed".
Can you add your tree to linux-next?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-next.html
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists