[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W6d-Asap63+MDga26k2krfNOZ4ftcM1HPp3T0oXWdA0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:36:54 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Sandeep Panda <spanda@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Don't compile GPIO bits
if not CONFIG_OF_GPIO
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:31 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> The kernel test robot noted that if "OF" is defined (which is needed
> to select DRM_TI_SN65DSI86 at all) but not OF_GPIO that we'd get
> compile failures because some of the members that we access in "struct
> gpio_chip" are only defined "#if defined(CONFIG_OF_GPIO)".
>
> All the GPIO bits in the driver are all nicely separated out. We'll
> guard them with the same "#if defined" that the header has and add a
> little stub function if OF_GPIO is not defined.
>
> Fixes: 27ed2b3f22ed ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Export bridge GPIOs to Linux")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
The kernel test robot gave me another yell over the weekend. I think
the whole series is ready to land, but if nothing else could at least
patch #1 land to fix the build error so the robot is happy?
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists