[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8da0c285-d707-a3d2-063e-472af5cc560f@boo.tc>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:00:52 +0100
From: Chris Boot <bootc@....tc>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target/sbp: remove firewire SBP target driver
On 15/06/2020 00:28, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Chris Boot wrote:
>
>> I expect that if someone finds this useful it can stick around (but
>> that's not my call).
>
> Who's call is that? If the patch had said "From: Martin K. Petersen" and
> "This driver is being removed because it has the following defects..."
> that would be some indication of a good-faith willingness to accept users
> as developers in the spirit of the GPL, which is what you seem to be
> alluding to (?).
If you're asking me, I'd say it was martin's call:
> SCSI TARGET SUBSYSTEM
> M: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
[...]
> F: drivers/target/
> F: include/target/
>> I just don't have the time or inclination or hardware to be able to
>> maintain it anymore, so someone else would have to pick it up.
>>
>
> Which is why most drivers get orphaned, right?
Sure, but that's not what Martin asked me to do, hence this patch.
--
Chris Boot
bootc@....tc
Powered by blists - more mailing lists