lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+H2tpF95rLRb8qbgCsrKBtjTV7JMTenuaYBHf19tpAXFqmqMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 23:08:12 +0800
From:   Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
Cc:     Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: sprd: get subdevices from DT instead for SC27XX SPI

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:12 PM Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:47 AM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> >
> > SC27XX-SPI added subdevices according to a pre-defined mfd_cell array,
> > no matter these devices were really included on board. So with this
> > patch we switch to a new way of detecting subdevices which are
> > defined in the devicetree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c | 102 +++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c b/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c
> > index 33336cde4724..aa3daa0cfcf5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c
> > @@ -93,73 +93,6 @@ enum usb_charger_type sprd_pmic_detect_charger_type(struct device *dev)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sprd_pmic_detect_charger_type);
> >
> > -static const struct mfd_cell sprd_pmic_devs[] = {
> > -       {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-wdt",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-wdt",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-rtc",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-rtc",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-charger",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-charger",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-chg-timer",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-chg-timer",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-fast-chg",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-fast-chg",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-chg-wdt",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-chg-wdt",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-typec",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-typec",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-flash",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-flash",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-eic",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-eic",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-efuse",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-efuse",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-thermal",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-thermal",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-adc",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-adc",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-audio-codec",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-audio-codec",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-regulator",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-regulator",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-vibrator",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-vibrator",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-keypad-led",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-keypad-led",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-bltc",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-bltc",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-fgu",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-fgu",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-7sreset",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-7sreset",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-poweroff",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-poweroff",
> > -       }, {
> > -               .name = "sc27xx-syscon",
> > -               .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-syscon",
> > -       },
> > -};
> > -
> >  static int sprd_pmic_spi_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
> >  {
> >         struct device *dev = context;
> > @@ -205,6 +138,35 @@ static const struct regmap_config sprd_pmic_config = {
> >         .max_register = 0xffff,
> >  };
> >
> > +static int sprd_pmic_add_subdevices(struct device *dev, int id,
> > +                        struct irq_domain *domain)
> > +{
> > +       int ret = 0;
> > +       struct device_node *child, *parent = dev->of_node;
> > +       struct mfd_cell cell = {0};
> > +       const char *comp;
> > +       unsigned int prefix_len = strlen("sprd,");
> > +       char buf[30];
> > +
> > +       for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) {
> > +               comp = of_get_property(child, "compatible", NULL);
> > +               if (!comp || strncmp("sprd,", comp, prefix_len))
> > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +               memcpy(buf, comp, strlen(comp) + 1);
> > +               cell.of_compatible = buf;
> > +               cell.name = buf + prefix_len;
>
> I feel it is a little hackish, you can create any device nodes from DT
> even the PMIC does not support.

In the old code, if sub cells have wrong compatible strings, he will not get
an opportunity to be probed.
It is confused to user for  there is no any error and warning message.
I think it maybe better to let them being probed even when they might be wrong.
The cell will check by itself --  return success in probing if in the
right place or return error if any
thing is wrong there.

Best,
Orson

>
> I am not sure the problem caused by the original method, you can use
> the compatible string to be compatible with different PMICs, such as
> SC2730 ADC:
> compatible = "sprd,sc2731-adc", "sprd,sc2730-adc";
>
> Moreover I think you can add the "sprd,sc2730-xxx" compatible string
> for the mfd_cell in this driver if you are sure we want to support
> SC2730 PMIC.
>
> > +
> > +               ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, id, &cell, 1, NULL, 0, domain);
> > +               if (ret) {
> > +                       pr_err("devm_mfd_add_devices return fail ret=%d\n", ret);
> > +                       break;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int sprd_pmic_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >  {
> >         struct sprd_pmic *ddata;
> > @@ -263,10 +225,8 @@ static int sprd_pmic_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >                 return ret;
> >         }
> >
> > -       ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > -                                  sprd_pmic_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(sprd_pmic_devs),
> > -                                  NULL, 0,
> > -                                  regmap_irq_get_domain(ddata->irq_data));
> > +       ret = sprd_pmic_add_subdevices(&spi->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > +                                      regmap_irq_get_domain(ddata->irq_data));
> >         if (ret) {
> >                 dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to register device %d\n", ret);
> >                 return ret;
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Baolin Wang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ