[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve1TgRrKF0_d-7dY6EZU36QszwQ1ezwE03RERKywCxGYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 19:07:42 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
HungNien Chen <hn.chen@...dahitech.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Pavel Balan <admin@...ma.net>, Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@....com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
You-Sheng Yang <vicamo.yang@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Only check the first byte for SMBus
block read length
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:06 PM Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:40:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 02:02:54PM -0700, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> > > From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
> > >
> > > SMBus block reads can be broken because the read function will just skip
> > > over bytes it doesn't like until reaching a byte that conforms to the
> > > length restrictions for block reads. This is problematic when it isn't
> > > known if the incoming payload is indeed a conforming block read.
> > >
> > > According to the SMBus specification, block reads will only send the
> > > payload length in the first byte, so we can fix this by only considering
> > > the first byte in a sequence for block read length purposes.
> >
> > I'm wondering if this overlaps with [1]. AFAIU that one is also makes sure that
> > the length is not a garbage.
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20200613104109.2989-1-mans@mansr.com/T/#u
>
> No overlap.
Thanks for clarifying.
> That looks like a similar bug for a different driver. In my case,
> the adapter provides native SMBus support, so emulation is never used. This is
> clear to see by looking at i2c_transfer_buffer_flags(), which only uses the
> master_xfer functions provided by the adapter; it doesn't call the emulation
> path at all.
But do we get an advantage if this can be done in the i2c core instead
(once for all)?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists