linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 025/134] x86/cpu/amd: Make erratum #1054 a legacy erratum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200616153101.959455794@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:33:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 025/134] x86/cpu/amd: Make erratum #1054 a legacy erratum

From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>

[ Upstream commit e2abfc0448a46d8a137505aa180caf14070ec535 ]

Commit

  21b5ee59ef18 ("x86/cpu/amd: Enable the fixed Instructions Retired
		 counter IRPERF")

mistakenly added erratum #1054 as an OS Visible Workaround (OSVW) ID 0.
Erratum #1054 is not OSVW ID 0 [1], so make it a legacy erratum.

There would never have been a false positive on older hardware that
has OSVW bit 0 set, since the IRPERF feature was not available.

However, save a couple of RDMSR executions per thread, on modern
system configurations that correctly set non-zero values in their
OSVW_ID_Length MSRs.

[1] Revision Guide for AMD Family 17h Models 00h-0Fh Processors. The
revision guide is available from the bugzilla link below.

Fixes: 21b5ee59ef18 ("x86/cpu/amd: Enable the fixed Instructions Retired counter IRPERF")
Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200417143356.26054-1-kim.phillips@amd.com
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206537
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index c3f4dd4ae155..c553cafd0736 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -1117,8 +1117,7 @@ static const int amd_erratum_383[] =
 
 /* #1054: Instructions Retired Performance Counter May Be Inaccurate */
 static const int amd_erratum_1054[] =
-	AMD_OSVW_ERRATUM(0, AMD_MODEL_RANGE(0x17, 0, 0, 0x2f, 0xf));
-
+	AMD_LEGACY_ERRATUM(AMD_MODEL_RANGE(0x17, 0, 0, 0x2f, 0xf));
 
 static bool cpu_has_amd_erratum(struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpu, const int *erratum)
 {
-- 
2.25.1