[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200616162350.GK13121@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:23:50 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 07:39:30AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> >
> > Indeed. I must have been looking at -net. Both -net and -net-next have
> > it conditional, so yes a fixup patch is needed.
> >
>
> I see that both net and net-next still have the conditional in xfrm_output:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
> IPCB(skb)->flags |= IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
> #endif
> break;
> case AF_INET6:
> memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
> IP6CB(skb)->flags |= IP6SKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
> #endif
>
> Did you submit the merge fix? If not, I can do it today.
I still have it in the ipsec tree, I'll do a pull request
this week. The fixup will go to the net tree then. It should
be already in linux-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists