lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202006161143.5A4226EC3A@keescook>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:43:43 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: misc: Use array_size() in if-statement controlling
 expression

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 05:41:12PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Use array_size() instead of the open-coded version in the controlling
> expression of the if statement.
> 
> Also, while there, use the preferred form for passing a size of a struct.
> The alternative form where struct name is spelled out hurts readability
> and introduces an opportunity for a bug when the pointer variable type is
> changed but the corresponding sizeof that is passed as argument is not.
> 
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and, audited and fixed
> manually.
> 
> Addresses-KSPP-ID: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/83
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ