linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.8-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200616203741.GA13437@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:37:41 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.8-rc1

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:11:46PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> I didn't look closer at that but from the error, it seems to be,
> some missing -fstack-protector* vs -fno-stack-protector* checks
> somewhere.

Can you give exact .config?

Also, what compiler exactly?

I have

CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR=y
CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR=y
CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE=y
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=y
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y

here and gcc9 builds it fine.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette