linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.8-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEJqkghK8cjtsKUGn0bJ8nurzu2saNcVOAKJ43BtmgANWMY38Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:19:27 +0200
From:   Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.8-rc1

Am Di., 16. Juni 2020 um 22:37 Uhr schrieb Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:11:46PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > I didn't look closer at that but from the error, it seems to be,
> > some missing -fstack-protector* vs -fno-stack-protector* checks
> > somewhere.
>
> Can you give exact .config?
>
> Also, what compiler exactly?

Sure, config and compiler information uploaded to there:

http://crazy.dev.frugalware.org/kernel/


>
> I have
>
> CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR=y
> CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR=y
> CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE=y
> CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=y
> CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
>
> here and gcc9 builds it fine.

I have gcc 9.2.1 20200215.