linux-kernel - RE: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: fix UBSAN warning using __builtin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB15994AAFA4C5903DDB3C5861F09D0@MWHPR11MB1599.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:39:17 +0000
From:   "Kaneda, Erik" <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
CC:     Jung-uk Kim <jkim@...ebsd.org>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        "dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "glider@...gle.com" <glider@...gle.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "pcc@...gle.com" <pcc@...gle.com>,
        "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>
Subject: RE: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: fix UBSAN warning using
 __builtin_offsetof



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:06 AM
> To: Kaneda, Erik <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
> Cc: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@...ebsd.org>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>;
> dvyukov@...gle.com; glider@...gle.com; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; mark.rutland@....com; pcc@...gle.com;
> rjw@...ysocki.net; will@...nel.org; stable@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> acpi@...r.kernel.org; devel@...ica.org
> Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: fix UBSAN warning using
> __builtin_offsetof
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 9:45 AM Kaneda, Erik <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@...eBSD.org>
> > >
> > > Actually, I think we should let platform-specific acfoo.h decide what to
> > > do here, i.e.,
> >
> > That's a better solution. For Linux, it would look something like this:
> >
> > --- a/include/acpi/actypes.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/actypes.h
> > @@ -508,10 +508,15 @@ typedef u64 acpi_integer;
> >
> >  #define ACPI_TO_POINTER(i)              ACPI_CAST_PTR (void, (acpi_size) (i))
> >  #define ACPI_TO_INTEGER(p)              ACPI_PTR_DIFF (p, (void *) 0)
> > -#define ACPI_OFFSET(d, f)               ACPI_PTR_DIFF (&(((d *) 0)->f), (void *)
> 0)
> >  #define ACPI_PHYSADDR_TO_PTR(i)         ACPI_TO_POINTER(i)
> >  #define ACPI_PTR_TO_PHYSADDR(i)         ACPI_TO_INTEGER(i)
> >
> > +/* Platforms may want to define their own ACPI_OFFSET */
> > +
> > +#ifndef ACPI_OFFSET
> > +#define ACPI_OFFSET(d, f)               ACPI_PTR_DIFF (&(((d *) 0)->f), (void
> *) 0)
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /* Optimizations for 4-character (32-bit) acpi_name manipulation */
> >
> >  #ifndef ACPI_MISALIGNMENT_NOT_SUPPORTED
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > index 987e2af7c335..5d1ca6015fce 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@
> >  #undef ACPI_DEBUG_DEFAULT
> >  #define ACPI_DEBUG_DEFAULT          (ACPI_LV_INFO | ACPI_LV_REPAIR)
> >
> > +/* Use gcc's builtin offset instead of the default */
> > +
> > +#undef ACPI_OFFSET
> > +#define ACPI_OFFSET(a,b)            __builtin_offsetof(a,b)
> > +
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
> >
> 
Hi,

Sorry about the delayed response.

> Looks good at first glance.  Wouldn't actypes.h need to include
> platform/acenv.h first though?  Otherwise you put some header
> inclusion order dependency on folks who include actypes.h to first
> include acenv.h otherwise we're not getting the definition in terms of
> __builtin_offsetof.

Actypes.h is intended for ACPICA use. For files using ACPI_OFFSET, they include headers like acpi.h that ends up including aclinux.h before including actypes.h. For those using ACPI_OFFSET, precedence will be given to the definition in aclinux.h before falling back to the definition in actypes.

Erik

> 
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers