[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o8piegvt.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:21:42 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/8xx: use pmd_off() to access a PMD entry in pte_update()
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:22:29 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> The pte_update() implementation for PPC_8xx unfolds page table from the PGD
>> level to access a PMD entry. Since 8xx has only 2-level page table this can
>> be simplified with pmd_off() shortcut.
>>
>> Replace explicit unfolding with pmd_off() and drop defines of pgd_index()
>> and pgd_offset() that are no longer needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I think it's powerpc material, but I won't mind if Andrew picks it up :)
>
> Via the powerpc tree would be better, please.
I'll take it into next for v5.9, unless there's a reason it needs to go
into v5.8.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists