[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000001d64439$98345740$c89d05c0$@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:55:21 +0900
From: "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
To: "'Tetsuhiro Kohada'" <kohada.t2@...il.com>
Cc: <kohada.tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
<mori.takahiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
<motai.hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
"'Sungjong Seo'" <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] exfat: remove EXFAT_SB_DIRTY flag
> remove EXFAT_SB_DIRTY flag and related codes.
>
> This flag is set/reset in exfat_put_super()/exfat_sync_fs() to avoid sync_blockdev().
> However ...
> - exfat_put_super():
> Before calling this, the VFS has already called sync_filesystem(), so sync is never performed here.
> - exfat_sync_fs():
> After calling this, the VFS calls sync_blockdev(), so, it is meaningless to check EXFAT_SB_DIRTY or to
> bypass sync_blockdev() here.
> Not only that, but in some cases can't clear VOL_DIRTY.
> ex:
> VOL_DIRTY is set when rmdir starts, but when non-empty-dir is detected, return error without setting
> EXFAT_SB_DIRTY.
> If performe 'sync' in this state, VOL_DIRTY will not be cleared.
There is still a problem if system reboot or device is unplugged when sync is not called yet.
I will remove this mention in the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists