[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <701eef9a40de93dcf5fe7063fd607bca5db38e05.1592287263.git.rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:04:07 +0800
From: Peng Wang <rocking@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Optimize dequeue_task_fair()
While looking at enqueue_task_fair and dequeue_task_fair, it occurred
to me that dequeue_task_fair can also be optimized as Vincent described
in commit 7d148be69e3a ("sched/fair: Optimize enqueue_task_fair()").
When encountering throttled cfs_rq, dequeue_throttle label can ensure
se not to be NULL, and rq->nr_running remains unchanged, so we can also
skip the early balance check.
Signed-off-by: Peng Wang <rocking@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index cbcb2f7..05242b7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5614,14 +5614,14 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
}
-dequeue_throttle:
- if (!se)
- sub_nr_running(rq, 1);
+ /* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/
+ sub_nr_running(rq, 1);
/* balance early to pull high priority tasks */
if (unlikely(!was_sched_idle && sched_idle_rq(rq)))
rq->next_balance = jiffies;
+dequeue_throttle:
util_est_dequeue(&rq->cfs, p, task_sleep);
hrtick_update(rq);
}
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists