[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0be86735238a0f8b0c25934e2ed39eee@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:55:05 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] firmware: QCOM_SCM: Allow qcom_scm driver to be
loadable as a permenent module
Hi John,
+Will for the SMMU part.
On 2020-06-16 07:13, John Stultz wrote:
> Allow the qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a
> permenent module.
>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/firmware/Makefile | 3 ++-
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> index fbd785dd0513..9e533a462bf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ config INTEL_STRATIX10_RSU
> Say Y here if you want Intel RSU support.
>
> config QCOM_SCM
> - bool
> + tristate "Qcom SCM driver"
> depends on ARM || ARM64
> select RESET_CONTROLLER
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/Makefile
> index 99510be9f5ed..cf24d674216b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/Makefile
> @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ISCSI_IBFT) += iscsi_ibft.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP) += memmap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) += raspberrypi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FW_CFG_SYSFS) += qemu_fw_cfg.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SCM) += qcom_scm.o qcom_scm-smc.o qcom_scm-legacy.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SCM) += qcom-scm.o
> +qcom-scm-objs += qcom_scm.o qcom_scm-smc.o qcom_scm-legacy.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_PROTOCOL) += ti_sci.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS) += trusted_foundations.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TURRIS_MOX_RWTM) += turris-mox-rwtm.o
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> index 0e7233a20f34..b5e88bf66975 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> @@ -1155,6 +1155,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> qcom_scm_dt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,scm" },
> {}
> };
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_scm_dt_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver qcom_scm_driver = {
> .driver = {
> @@ -1170,3 +1171,6 @@ static int __init qcom_scm_init(void)
> return platform_driver_register(&qcom_scm_driver);
> }
> subsys_initcall(qcom_scm_init);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SCM driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> index b510f67dfa49..714893535dd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ config SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
> config ARM_SMMU
> tristate "ARM Ltd. System MMU (SMMU) Support"
> depends on (ARM64 || ARM || (COMPILE_TEST && !GENERIC_ATOMIC64)) &&
> MMU
> + depends on QCOM_SCM || !QCOM_SCM #if QCOM_SCM=m this can't be =y
This looks a bit ugly. Could you explain why we need this at the SMMU
level? I'd have expected the dependency to flow the other way around...
> select IOMMU_API
> select IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
> select ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU if ARM
> @@ -500,6 +501,7 @@ config QCOM_IOMMU
> # Note: iommu drivers cannot (yet?) be built as modules
> bool "Qualcomm IOMMU Support"
> depends on ARCH_QCOM || (COMPILE_TEST && !GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
> + depends on QCOM_SCM=y
> select IOMMU_API
> select IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
> select ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists