[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200616095027.1a2048d0@oasis.local.home>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:50:27 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Lichao Liu <liulichao@...ngson.cn>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Don't active rt throtting when no running cfs
task
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:37:29 +0800
Lichao Liu <liulichao@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> Active rt throtting will dequeue rt_rq from rq at least 50ms,
> When there is no running cfs task, do we still active it?
>
This is something I would like to have.
Peter, what's your thought on this?
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Lichao Liu <liulichao@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index df11d88c9895..d6524347cea0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -961,12 +961,13 @@ static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>
> if (rt_rq->rt_time > runtime) {
> struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
> + struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
>
> /*
> * Don't actually throttle groups that have no runtime assigned
> * but accrue some time due to boosting.
> */
> - if (likely(rt_b->rt_runtime)) {
> + if (likely(rt_b->rt_runtime) && rq->cfs.nr_running > 0) {
> rt_rq->rt_throttled = 1;
> printk_deferred_once("sched: RT throttling activated\n");
> } else {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists