linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] MCA and EDAC updates for AMD Family 17h, Model 60h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200616143517.GH13515@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:35:17 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Jacky Hu <hengqing.hu@...il.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] MCA and EDAC updates for AMD Family 17h, Model 60h

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:01:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Looks like we may have to black-list current measurements
> for that chip, though.
> 
> Guenter
> 
> >> Jacky Hu (2):
> >>   x86/amd_nb: Add Family 17h, Model 60h PCI IDs
> >>   EDAC/amd64: Add family ops for Family 17h Models 60h-6Fh
> >>
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c  |  5 +++++
> >>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |  3 +++
> >>  drivers/hwmon/k10temp.c   |  2 ++

... meaning I should not take the k10temp changes yet? I can drop them
and take the rest...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette