[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200616153111.522289162@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:34:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Franck LENORMAND <franck.lenormand@....com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 098/163] firmware: imx: scu: Fix corruption of header
From: Franck LENORMAND <franck.lenormand@....com>
[ Upstream commit f5f27b79eab80de0287c243a22169e4876b08d5e ]
The header of the message to send can be changed if the
response is longer than the request:
- 1st word, the header is sent
- the remaining words of the message are sent
- the response is received asynchronously during the
execution of the loop, changing the size field in
the header
- the for loop test the termination condition using
the corrupted header
It is the case for the API build_info which has just a
header as request but 3 words in response.
This issue is fixed storing the header locally instead of
using a pointer on it.
Fixes: edbee095fafb (firmware: imx: add SCU firmware driver support)
Signed-off-by: Franck LENORMAND <franck.lenormand@....com>
Reviewed-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c b/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c
index e94a5585b698..b3da2e193ad2 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void imx_scu_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *c, void *msg)
static int imx_scu_ipc_write(struct imx_sc_ipc *sc_ipc, void *msg)
{
- struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = msg;
+ struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr = *(struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *)msg;
struct imx_sc_chan *sc_chan;
u32 *data = msg;
int ret;
@@ -166,13 +166,13 @@ static int imx_scu_ipc_write(struct imx_sc_ipc *sc_ipc, void *msg)
int i;
/* Check size */
- if (hdr->size > IMX_SC_RPC_MAX_MSG)
+ if (hdr.size > IMX_SC_RPC_MAX_MSG)
return -EINVAL;
- dev_dbg(sc_ipc->dev, "RPC SVC %u FUNC %u SIZE %u\n", hdr->svc,
- hdr->func, hdr->size);
+ dev_dbg(sc_ipc->dev, "RPC SVC %u FUNC %u SIZE %u\n", hdr.svc,
+ hdr.func, hdr.size);
- size = sc_ipc->fast_ipc ? 1 : hdr->size;
+ size = sc_ipc->fast_ipc ? 1 : hdr.size;
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
sc_chan = &sc_ipc->chans[i % 4];
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists