[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADaigPVvZrP_mOcB5f7w77t+4O1=Ya2VW8Ff96EzemO6swr_8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:37:06 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@...il.com>,
will@...nel.org, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
zhengbin <zhengbin13@...wei.com>,
tongtiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>,
Drew Davenport <ddavenport@...omium.org>,
Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/msm: Refactor address space initialization
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:16 PM Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > Refactor how address space initialization works. Instead of having the
> > address space function create the MMU object (and thus require separate but
> > equal functions for gpummu and iommu) use a single function and pass the
> > MMU struct in. Make the generic code cleaner by using target specific
> > functions to create the address space so a2xx can do its own thing in its
> > own space. For all the other targets use a generic helper to initialize
> > IOMMU but leave the door open for newer targets to use customization
> > if they need it.
>
> I'm seeing regressions in dEQP-VK.memory.allocation.random.* on cheza
> after this commit. The symptom is that large allocations fail with
> -ENOSPC from MSM_GEM_INFO(IOVA).
>
> Possibly relevant change from having stuffed some debug info in:
>
> before:
> [ 3.791436] [drm:msm_gem_address_space_create] *ERROR* msmgem
> address space create: 0x1000000 + 0xfeffffff
> [ 3.801672] platform 506a000.gmu: Adding to iommu group 6
> [ 3.807359] [drm:msm_gem_address_space_create] *ERROR* msmgem
> address space create: 0x0 + 0x7fffffff
> [ 3.817140] msm ae00000.mdss: bound 5000000.gpu (ops a3xx_ops)
> [ 3.823212] msm_dpu ae01000.mdp: [drm:msm_ioremap] *ERROR* failed
> to get memory resource: vbif_nrt
> [ 3.832429] msm_dpu ae01000.mdp: [drm:msm_ioremap] *ERROR* failed
> to get memory resource: regdma
> [ 3.841478] [drm:dpu_kms_hw_init:878] dpu hardware revision:0x40000000
> [ 3.848193] [drm:msm_gem_address_space_create] *ERROR* msmgem
> address space create: 0x1000 + 0xffffefff
>
> after:
>
> [ 3.798707] [drm:msm_gem_address_space_create] *ERROR* msmgem
> address space create: 0x1000000 + 0xfffffff
> [ 3.808731] platform 506a000.gmu: Adding to iommu group 6
> [ 3.814440] [drm:msm_gem_address_space_create] *ERROR* msmgem
> address space create: 0x0 + 0x7fffffff
> [ 3.820494] hub 2-1:1.0: USB hub found
> [ 3.824108] msm ae00000.mdss: bound 5000000.gpu (ops a3xx_ops)
> [ 3.828554] hub 2-1:1.0: 4 ports detected
> [ 3.833756] msm_dpu ae01000.mdp: [drm:msm_ioremap] *ERROR* failed
> to get memory resource: vbif_nrt
> [ 3.847038] msm_dpu ae01000.mdp: [drm:msm_ioremap] *ERROR* failed
> to get memory resource: regdma
> [ 3.856095] [drm:dpu_kms_hw_init:878] dpu hardware revision:0x40000000
> [ 3.862840] [drm:msm_gem_address_space_create] *ERROR* msmgem
> address space create: 0x1000 + 0xfffffff
>
> 256MB for GMU address space?
Found the bug, fixes at the last 2 commits of
https://github.com/anholt/linux/tree/drm-msm-address-space
I'm going to try having another go at convincing gmail to let git
send-email through, but all the howtos in the world didn't work last
time (gsuite has different behavior from normal gmail).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists