[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e37785fc-8d3e-bc7f-bd03-bb6ec0a6843f@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:29:18 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
simon@...e.lp0.eu, jonas.gorski@...il.com, kishon@...com,
vkoul@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
krzk@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alcooperx@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: add bcm63xx-usbh bindings
On 6/17/2020 2:20 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 6/16/2020 11:45 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>> Document BCM63xx USBH PHY bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
>
>
>
> Since the USB PHY supports both roles (host and device) on a large
> number of SoCs, I would just remove "H" from the subject/binding/name
> accordingly. With that:
Well, the register is indeed named USBH, so the name can stay as-is,
this is fine, thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists