[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dddfef643fc5bef1ff440f18c3dd12f586195a7c.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:13:28 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>, jbaron@...mai.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux@...musvillemoes.dk, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@...soc.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/21] dyndbg: add user-flag, negating-flags, and
filtering on flags
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 10:25 -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> 1. Add a user-flag [u] which works like the [pfmlt] flags, but has no
> effect on callsite behavior; it allows incremental marking of
> arbitrary sets of callsites.
>
> 2. Add [PFMLTU] flags, which negate their counterparts; P===!p etc.
> And in ddebug_read_flags():
> current code does: [pfmltu_] -> flags
> copy it to: [PFMLTU_] -> mask
>
> also disallow both of a pair: ie no 'pP', no true & false.
>
> 3. Add filtering ops into ddebug_change(), right after all the
> callsite-property selections are complete. These filter on the
> callsite's current flagstate before applying modflags.
>
> Why ?
>
> The u-flag & filter flags
>
> The 'u' flag lets the user assemble an arbitary set of callsites.
> Then using filter flags, user can activate the 'u' callsite set.
>
> #> echo 'file foo.c +u; file bar.c +u' > control # and repeat
> #> echo 'u+p' > control
>
> Of course, you can continue to just activate your set without ever
> marking it 1st, but you could trivially add the markup as you go, then
> be able to use it as a constraint later, to undo or modify your set.
Does this set selection also allow for selection by
increasing decimal level?
Can sites be enabled for a value less than x?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists