lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200617230548.GC27751@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:05:48 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, virtio-fs@...hat.com,
        miklos@...redi.hu, stefanha@...hat.com, dgilbert@...hat.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm: Add capability to be able to report async pf
 error to guest

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 04:00:52PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 05:51:52PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> What I'm saying is that KVM cannot do the filtering.  KVM, by design, does
> not know what lies behind any given hva, or what the associated gpa maps to
> in the guest.  As is, userspace can't even opt out of this behavior, e.g.
> it can't even "filter" on a per-VM granularity, since kvm_pv_enable_async_pf()
> unconditionally allows the guest to enable the behavior[*].

Let me rephrase that slightly.  KVM can do the filtering, but it cannot make
the decision on what to filter.  E.g. if the use case is compatible with doing
this at a memslot level, then a memslot flag could be added to control the
behavior.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ