[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200617233755.GI62794@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 02:37:55 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
peterhuewe@....de, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...aro.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/3] optee: register drivers on optee bus
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:29:07AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Hi Maxim and Jarkko,
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 05:32:40PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> > ping.
> > Patchset was reviewed and all comments are codeverd. Optee-os patches
> > were merged. These kernel patches look like they are hanging
> > somewhere...
>
> I'm almost OK with this patchset, except that
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices needs to be updated
> for the new kernel version and TEE mailing list which we're changing right
> now.
>
> The last patch touches files I'm not maintainer of. That patch depends
> on the previous patches so it makes sense to keep them together. If a
> TPM device driver maintainer would ack that patch I can take it via my
> tree. Or we can do it the other way around (with a v9 patchset),
> whichever is preferred.
>
> Cheers,
> Jens
Probably easier if you pick all three and I ack the one touching TPM.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists