[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHpGcMK6Yu0p-FO8CciiySqh+qcWLG-t3hEaUg-rqJnS=2uhqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:57:14 +0200
From: Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>,
William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v11 16/25] fs: Convert mpage_readpages to mpage_readahead
Am Mi., 17. Juni 2020 um 02:33 Uhr schrieb Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:36:13AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Am Mi., 15. Apr. 2020 um 23:39 Uhr schrieb Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>:
> > > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
> > >
> > > Implement the new readahead aop and convert all callers (block_dev,
> > > exfat, ext2, fat, gfs2, hpfs, isofs, jfs, nilfs2, ocfs2, omfs, qnx6,
> > > reiserfs & udf). The callers are all trivial except for GFS2 & OCFS2.
> >
> > This patch leads to an ABBA deadlock in xfstest generic/095 on gfs2.
> >
> > Our lock hierarchy is such that the inode cluster lock ("inode glock")
> > for an inode needs to be taken before any page locks in that inode's
> > address space.
>
> How does that work for ...
>
> writepage: yes, unlocks (see below)
> readpage: yes, unlocks
> invalidatepage: yes
> releasepage: yes
> freepage: yes
> isolate_page: yes
> migratepage: yes (both)
> putback_page: yes
> launder_page: yes
> is_partially_uptodate: yes
> error_remove_page: yes
>
> Is there a reason that you don't take the glock in the higher level
> ops which are called before readhead gets called? I'm looking at XFS,
> and it takes the xfs_ilock SHARED in xfs_file_buffered_aio_read()
> (called from xfs_file_read_iter).
Right, the approach from the following thread might fix this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20191122235324.17245-1-agruenba@redhat.com/T/#t
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists