[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1592390637-17441-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:43:56 +0200
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: pasic@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
david@...son.dropbear.id.au, linuxram@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] s390: virtio: let arch choose to accept devices without IOMMU feature
An architecture protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host
access may want to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the
use of VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM.
Let's give a chance to the architecture to accept or not devices
without VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM.
Pierre Morel (1):
s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature
arch/s390/mm/init.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/virtio.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
Changelog
to v3:
- add warning
(Connie, Christian)
- add comment
(Connie)
- change hook name
(Halil, Connie)
to v2:
- put the test in virtio_finalize_features()
(Connie)
- put the test inside VIRTIO core
(Jason)
- pass a virtio device as parameter
(Halil)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists