[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200617140803.181333-1-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:08:03 +0800
From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@...wei.com>
To: <bvanassche@....org>, <dledford@...hat.com>, <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<jingxiangfeng@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] IB/srpt: Remove WARN_ON from srpt_cm_req_recv
The callers pass the pointer '&req' or 'private_data' to
srpt_cm_req_recv(), and 'private_data' is initialized in srp_send_req().
'sdev' is allocated and stored in srpt_add_one(). It's easy to show that
sdev and req are always valid. So we remove unnecessary WARN_ON.
Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@...wei.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
index ef7fcd3..0fa65c6 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
@@ -2156,9 +2156,6 @@ static int srpt_cm_req_recv(struct srpt_device *const sdev,
WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled());
- if (WARN_ON(!sdev || !req))
- return -EINVAL;
-
it_iu_len = be32_to_cpu(req->req_it_iu_len);
pr_info("Received SRP_LOGIN_REQ with i_port_id %pI6, t_port_id %pI6 and it_iu_len %d on port %d (guid=%pI6); pkey %#04x\n",
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists