lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD8XO3bY7tsEF29AoXtREQ=tYyAL34s2uHke5LiRaKPBx8Xm2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:26:42 +0300
From:   Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@...aro.org>
To:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
        peterhuewe@....de, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...aro.org>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/3] optee: register drivers on optee bus

On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 11:29, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim and Jarkko,
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 05:32:40PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> > ping.
> > Patchset was reviewed and all comments are codeverd. Optee-os patches
> > were merged. These kernel patches look like they are hanging
> > somewhere...
>
> I'm almost OK with this patchset, except that
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices needs to be updated
> for the new kernel version and TEE mailing list which we're changing right
> now.
>

What is the new mailing list address? I did git pull the latest
master and get_maintainer.pl still points to
tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org.

Maxim.

> The last patch touches files I'm not maintainer of. That patch depends
> on the previous patches so it makes sense to keep them together.  If a
> TPM device driver maintainer would ack that patch I can take it via my
> tree. Or we can do it the other way around (with a v9 patchset),
> whichever is preferred.
>
> Cheers,
> Jens
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Maxim.
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 20:58, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > v8: - fix v7 check.
> > > v7: - check return value of dev_set_name() (Jarkko Sakkinen)
> > > v6: - description, comments, patches reorder and destroy workqueue (Sumit Garg)
> > > v5: - removed pr_err and fix typos in description (Jarkko Sakkinen)
> > >     - added missed kfree in optee_open()
> > > v4: - sysfs entry is optee-ta-uuid (Jerome Forissier, Sumit Garg)
> > >     - added Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
> > > v3: - support tee-suppicant restart (Jens Wiklander)
> > >     - description and comments (Jarkko Sakkinen)
> > >     - do not name optee drivers by index in sysfs (Sumit Garg)
> > > v2: - write TEE with capital letters.
> > >     - declare __optee_enumerate_device() as static.
> > >
> > > Maxim Uvarov (3):
> > >   optee: use uuid for sysfs driver entry
> > >   optee: enable support for multi-stage bus enumeration
> > >   tpm_ftpm_tee: register driver on TEE bus
> > >
> > >  .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices       |  8 +++
> > >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
> > >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c               | 70 ++++++++++++++++---
> > >  drivers/tee/optee/core.c                      | 27 ++++++-
> > >  drivers/tee/optee/device.c                    | 38 +++++-----
> > >  drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h             | 10 ++-
> > >  6 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ